Saturday, February 11, 2012

Marcos on Marx


My readings on the life of Karl Marx have yielded both examples of and contrasts to a surprising number of recent class themes:

PARTICIPATION>CONTENT CREATION

The manner in which Marx discovered, refined, and subsequently disseminated his opinions and ideas reflects several primary mediums for the flow of ideas during the 19th century.
Marx was a prolific writer. His longer treatises (such as Capital and The Communist Manifesto) were many years in the works, and he was known to ignore publishers’ deadlines. He also wrote shorter articles for French and German periodicals, in addition to contributing material to the New York Tribune.

Newspapers could perhaps be called the “blogs” of the period. Editors heavily influenced a paper’s content and political slant; circulation (or the government) most often determined their lifespan.

INFORMATION>CONNECTIVITY >DIGITAL DIVIDE

Universities were centers of thought and seed beds for new ideologies, but only for those with the necessary funds. Marx was heavily influenced by the philosophy of Professor G.W.F. Hegel (more on this philosophy in an upcoming post). The professor died a few years before Marx transferred to his school, the University of Berlin, but Karl joined the ranks of the “New Hegelians” on campus.

PARTICIPATION>SOCIAL NETWORKING

Social (though not google+) circles and beliefs were deeply intertwined. Marx was influenced by his future father-in-law, the Baron von Westphalen from a young age (they were neighbors). The views on utopian socialism Karl picked up from the Baron were tempered by his father, Heinrich Marx. Later, social circles in Paris, Brussels, and England contributed to the refinement of Karl’s ideas. Marx made the acquaintance of Friedrich Engels, one of his chief collaborators, in these circles.
Social Proof existed even during the 19th century, as evidenced by the inclusion of some Marx’s writings in “a series of pamphlets on ‘Leaders in Modern Thought’” (Singer). In addition, “Marx and Engels kept up a correspondence with revolutionaries throughout Europe who shared their views” (Singer).

CONTROL>DISRUPTION>CENSORSHIP

The Prussian Monarchy didn’t like Marx’s ideas, and censored at least one of the publications he edited while in Germany, the Rheinische Zeitung (the Rhenish Gazette). They eventually forced him from the country. He took another (short-lived) editing post in Paris, but the French government yielded to pressure from the Purssian monarchs and Marx was again obligated to flee, this time to Brussels. 

PARTICIPATION>COLLABORATION

Marx helped organize two early forums for Communist thought: the Communist Correspondence Committee, and The International Workingmen’s Association also known as “First International.” Marx was head of this second forum, and when members started to differ from his views, Karl effectively dissolved the organization by moving its headquarters to New York, out of feasible communication range for its European members. 

CONTROL>IDENTITY>REPUTATION

Education and the value of a degree
Following the death of his father, Marx realized he couldn’t remain at university indefinitely, and submitted his doctoral thesis to the University of Jena instead of the University of Berlin (which had much stricter standards). As Buchholz states, the University of Jena was “a noted diploma mill.”

One of the great benefits of studying history through the lens of digital and social media is the validation of “our” digital concepts. We find that while there are some new means and mediums, the base concepts are in fact iterative in nature and have evolved throughout history.

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Musings

Last Tuesday, one of the “Openness” presentations sparked some discussion on education, which we were able to continue somewhat on google+. Jared Halpin shared a link to uncollege.org, which I have been perusing over the past week (I’m not dropping out just yet). Tonight I just finished listening to a 1.5 hour dialogue between Dale Stephens (founder of the UnCollege movement) and Michael Ellsberg, author of The Education of Millionaires. You don’t have to tell me, my Saturday nights are riveting.

All jokes aside, I found the discussion exceedingly interesting, and very much in line with our themes of self-directed learning and open education. I even think these guys may be two of the thought leaders we are looking for. You can see an outline of the discussion here. If you decide to listen, be aware that some of the statements are passionately enhanced with expletives.

Dale Stephens’ efforts are focused on fighting the idea that you must possess a college degree in order to be successful. Ellsberg’s slant emphasizes “practical” education; he describes his new book as: “a bootstrapper’s guide to investing in your own human capital.”

One of the high points of the discussion is a parallel drawn by Ellsberg between the former Soviet State and our current education system (found at 26:45). He explains a bit about a concept known as Goodhart’s Law, which basically holds that when specifications are given and emphasized, individuals evolve (or devolve) to fit them. Ellsberg sees a parallel to standardized testing (making reference elsewhere in the discussion to college entrance exams) and goes on to state: “kid’s entire lives are being shaped and molded just to fit these tests.”

That statement resonated with me as I reflected on my High School academic career. It was highly competitive and GPA focused, but for what? I do feel like I came into college with the ability to write well, and I know something about prioritizing assignments for maximum (or minimum) effect on GPA. I could write my own treatise on cramming. These are skills that have their place and can even be transferred and made useful outside of the traditional educational environment. But they are not the skills (aside from writing and communication) that I want to define my university experience.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

On Keynotes and Lecture Notes


I was also scribbling (typing) thoughts about presentations last class, and after seeing the recent posts from Dr. Burton and classmate Hwanhi Chung, I decided to contribute some of my musings.

Here is the question I asked myself: “What is the purpose of a presentation?”
           
“To inspire further research by the attendees later?” posited my lofty, philosophical self.
           
“To spill my knowledge into your brain?”  retorted my college-general-attending self.
           
“To burn time?” snorted my cynical self
           
“Tradition?”offered my nostalgic self.

The next set of musings could follow this question: “What makes a Keynote speaker?”

I believe that speakers of note are invited to present because they wield one or both of these attributes:

1.  Their ideas or experiences are deemed important enough that others should be made aware of and gain some basic understanding concerning them. Their ideas or experiences. Not their rehashing of someone else’s ideas or experience, necessary as that might be for purposes of context.

Steve Jobs: How to live before you die


  
2. The other attribute of a great presenter is that their manner of presenting highly engages the audience, eliciting response and action. This is the presenter who connects with his or her audience, instead of talking at an audience.

What is the difference between a rehash of information and the more eloquent manner of presenting?

Rehashing results in bullet points, while a developed manner of presenting yields a memorable experience.  

Randy Bott, BYU


(0:40-1:00 for the pertinent part of the video)

In church and at school, we are invited to present (or give talks) at least in part because the preparation of the presentation has the potential to yield great educational returns to the one preparing.

Shouldn’t we also be striving to develop those two traits of the master presenters? Why not take the opportunity to develop our own ideas and reactions, and polish our manner of presenting them?

A question I will ask myself as I contribute to my upcoming group presentations:

How can I make my presentation go farther than what the audience can get from downloading my slides?